U.S. Sixth Circuit Court Upholds Traditional Marriage Laws in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee
The following release was put out yesterday by CCV Action, the legislative action arm of Citizens for Community Values. Finally, some good sense and humility out of a federal court on the same-sex “marriage” issue! [Read the full decision HERE.] We reprint Judge Jeffrey Sutton’s words below because they represent such a stark contrast to those of other federal judges who, like so many “progressives” and judicial elitists, relish “making history” on homosexuality-based “marriage” even if it means invalidating millions of votes and disenfranchising millions of American citizens on this critical moral and social issue.
Judge Sutton said:
The 2-1 majority decision continues:
What a concept: let ‘We the People’ have our say on one of the most controversial issues of our time–rather than imposing a “solution” through the dubious application of laws and amendments intended to correct societal racism to reinventing marriage itself.
Congratulations to Phil Burress and CCV–and pro-family advocates in the other states–for all their hard work in defending marriage as what it is: a sacred union between one man and one woman. — Peter LaBarbera, AFTAH
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact Phil Burress, President
By a 2-1 vote, the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court has ruled that the marriage laws of Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee do not violate the federal Constitution. Judge Jeffrey Sutton, joined by Judge Deborah Cook, wrote the majority opinion.
The court looked at the law and ruled correctly. This marriage question is a states’ rights issue, and no state should be unjustly forced to accept another state’s license according to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S.
Constitution. Neither a law license, beautician’s license, nor a hunting license should be recognized and honored by another state if that state already has a strong public policy against that license. It should be the same with a marriage license. Ohio has a strong public policy that says marriage is one man and one woman. Massachusetts does not get to determine marriage policy for Ohio. It’s that simple, and the Federal 6th Circuit Court got it right.
In his written opinion, Judge Sutton did an excellent job recognizing and articulating proper constitutional authority. We’ve included a few quotes from his opinion:
This article was posted on Friday, November 7th, 2014 at 5:29 am and is filed under "Civil Unions" & "Gay Marriage", "Civil Unions" & "Gay Marriage", "Sexual Orientation"/"Gender Identity" and the Law, News. You can follow any updates to this article through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Want to See Every New AFTAH Article?
If you don't want to miss anything posted on the Americans For Truth website, sign up for our "Feedblitz" service that gives you a daily email of every new article that we post. (This service DOES NOT replace the regular email list.) To sign up for the Feedblitz service, click here.
|Copyright © 2006-2011 Americans for Truth. All Rights Reserved.|