Study: Liberal Church Political Participation Growing, Conservative Church Political Involvement Decreasing

“Evil prevails when good churches do nothing.”

Godless ‘Morality’ Advocates…like “gay Christian” activist Matthew Vines are filling the void left by biblical pastors who refuse to get involved in the Culture War over morality in America. In what might be termed a form of “Satanic evangelism,” Vines’ Reformation Project trains people to go into evangelical churches with appealing, homosexuality-affirming and “gay theology” messages–“to create an environment in which Christian leaders will have the freedom to take the next steps toward affirming and including LGBT people in all aspects of church life.” In other words, to infiltrate churches to get them to accommodate a sexual sin that the Word of God calls an abomination. For some actual truth on the subject, see Prof. Rob Gagnon’s paper, “How Bad Is Homosexual Practice According to Scripture?”

Dear Readers,

This piece by my friend Micah Clark, who ably runs the Indiana Family Association, confirms what many of us already knew: pastors are copping out of the Culture War over moral values. As it turns out, liberal (apostate) churches–usually pro-abortion “rights,” pro-LGBTQ and socialist-leaning–are filling the Public Square void. In other words, an organized onslaught of secular and religious liberals is working to radically change transform this nation. And remember: leftist “change agents”–the same fellows who used to scream: “Don’t impose your morality on us!”–do all their destructive modernist work in the name of “morality.”

The Left marches lockstep to aggressively push its humanist, anti-God “morality.” What has happened to the real people of faith who should be today’s moral leaders? — @PeterLaBarbera, AFTAH

________________________________

How to Lose Freedom in One Easy Step

By Micah Clark

Millions of Americans may be watching the Republican national convention this week.  Some data is finding that this in an election year in which record numbers of voters seem to be interested in deciding who will be our next president.   For example, the Republican primary has seen a 62% increase in voter turnout this year over 2012, from 19.2 million votes four years ago to 31 million this year.

This may be why a new study of church engagement has caught pollsters by surprise. The new study from the American Culture and Faith Institute is being described as “nothing less than astounding.”
At a time when religious hostility is on the rise and recognized as a problem among a majority of all Americans, the very institutions targeted by such bigotry are in full retreating from the battle.

The study of 600 theologically conservative evangelical pastors finds that they are “unlikely to call their congregations to participate in any meaningful way” in the 2016 election.

Each pastor was asked about eight specific types of actions that churches could take in the months leading up to Election Day.  For a benchmark, the pastors were first asked if they had done any of these things during the 2014 mid-term elections.  There was not a single activity in which more pastors planned to engage during this major election compared to the less substantial 2014 mid-term elections.

For example, even the easiest, most obvious, and minimal of actions may see a large decline.  In 2014 more than three quarters of pastors (78%) encouraged their congregations to vote.   This year, less than two-thirds, just 62%, plan to do so.

Two years ago, 37% of conservative pastors attempted to educate their congregation with a sermon that taught Biblical principles on one or more issues relevant to that year’s campaign.  Now, only 21% say that they plan to teach a Biblical foundation for positions on issues relevant to this year’s election cycle.

The numbers for conservative churches planning on voter registration or voter guides distribution are even worse.  In 2014, only 21% did voter registration efforts in their church. This year, a mere 12% can be expected to do so.  The percent of conservative churches likely to pass out or point their members to online voter guides is expected to drop by nine points to just 36%.    (Other polls have placed the number of churches using voter guides to be less than 15%.)

In response to this study, religious pollster George Barna noted:

One minister who is defying this mold in calling for church involvement in a time when our religious freedoms seem to hanging by a thread is evangelist Franklin Graham.  He has observed, “It seems that many pastors do not want to be judged for supporting a candidate who is morally imperfect.  But the truth is that none of us – these pastors included – are morally perfect which is why we need Jesus . . . all candidates have always been morally flawed – they’re human.  In the meantime we need to work together to elect leaders who will allow the Church to follow Christ with as much freedom and as little government interference as possible.”

Over the last 30 years the liberal media has done a very good job of indoctrinating the nation with a false narrative that serves their goal of marginalizing the church.  That falsehood is a picture of Christ following churches as regular gatherings to rail against abortion, homosexuals, and to train member on how to elect candidate who can moralize a nation.

The National Congregations Study conducted between 1998 and 2012 tells a totally different story.  This research looked at what churches really do in terms of social action.  The results may surprise many readers. Between 1998 and 2012, the percentage of churches participating in at least one type of service-related activityincreased from 71 percent to 78 percent.  Yet, the percentage of churches participating in at least one type of political activity decreased from 43 percent to 35 percent.

The Congregations Study finds that among all types of churches participation in service activities is substantial and rising, while political participation is small and shrinking.  Political action is decreasing most among white evangelical churches with only between 7 and 11% doing anything in terms of elections or civic action.

However, the political participation rate among liberal churches has been substantial and increasing. In 2012, 80% of liberal churches participated in at least one type of political activity, making them three times more likely than conservative churches to be politically engaged.

I witnessed this disparity during the battle over marriage when Bible believing churches were noticeably absent in the Indiana State House.  Many times I had legislators ask me with great frustration, “Where are the churches? Why aren’t they here defending marriage?”  Yet, the liberal pastors and churches supporting the unraveling of God’s design were there in droves pushing the gay agenda.

When it comes to the churches embracing good works that society approves, such as food pantries, neighborhood clean ups, or intermural sports clubs, compared to the more difficult and less popular task of being “a watchman on the wall,” one often works against the other. A decline in political participation limits the role churches can play in seriously addressing social needs. Meeting immediate needs without also pursuing long-term solutions through political participation can make actually fixing the problem creating personal needs and harms impossible.

The issue at hand remains.  A surefire way to ensure the loss of religious freedom in America today is for the church to hide its light under a basket when it comes to our civic duties and the privileges of being Americans.  Our ability to choose leaders and impact public policies is a blessing that few nations in the world have ever enjoyed.

I sense that many in the church are motionlessly waiting for God “to do something” in the face of our cultural decline, when He may be waiting for us to act.  To modify Edmund Burke’s famous adage, “evil prevails when good churches do nothing.”   Sadly, according to this research, “nothing” is exactly what most may be doing this election cycle.